DPR v15 · Sept 2026 · Confidential v15
BANKING & INVESTOR SUBMISSION · DPR v15

Fluxara Advanced
Renewables & Applications

Precipitated Silica (PS) & Nano-PCC Circular Biorefinery · Sangareddy, Telangana · CIN: U35106TS2026PTC210706 · DPIIT: 246192

₹30.96 Cr
Total Project Cost
65% debt · 35% equity
₹61.75 Cr
Year 4+ Revenue
100% utilisation
₹39.35 Cr
Year 4+ EBITDA
63.7% margin
9.64×
Year 4+ DSCR
Covenant: >1.25×
~38%
Project IRR
Equity IRR ~68%
4,339 MT
PS / Year (Ph1A)
13.149 MT/day
6,690 MT
PCC / Year (Ph1A)
20.272 MT/day
Section 01
Executive Summary

What Fluxara does, why it works, and the key numbers a banker or investor needs to know.

The Core Idea — Waste to Value, Twice Over

Rice mills produce two waste streams: rice husk (the outer shell, ~20% of paddy weight) and the ash left after burning it (RHA — Rice Husk Ash). Both are abundant, cheap, and usually discarded. Fluxara converts them into two high-value industrial chemicals.

Precipitated Silica (PS) is the same white powder used in high-performance green tyres, toothpaste, food anti-caking, and industrial rubber. Global price: ₹26–95/kg depending on grade. It is made from the silicon dioxide (SiO₂) locked inside RHA — up to 92% of the ash is amorphous silica.

Nano-PCC (Precipitated Calcium Carbonate) is an obligatory co-product of the NaOH recovery step. When NaOH is recycled after silica extraction, it reacts with lime (CaO) and produces ultra-fine calcium carbonate — the same filler used in paints, plastics, silicone sealants, and paper. Price: ₹8–42/kg by grade.

The plant is thermally self-sufficient: rice husk is burned on-site to generate 199 GJ/day of heat. After running all processes (with MVR heat recovery), 83 GJ/day surplus remains — enough to power a Phase 1B expansion and a future Phase 2 line without buying any fuel.

Company & Location

Fluxara Advanced Renewables & Applications Pvt Ltd

CIN: U35106TS2026PTC210706 · DPIIT: 246192

Promoted by M/S Surya Industries

Site: 3 acres TSIIC Sangareddy, Telangana (₹1 Cr/acre)

Operating: 330 days/yr · 3 × 8-hr shifts/day

Phase Structure

Phase 1A — Bank-funded, Day 1 of commissioning
20 MT/day rice husk + 11.432 MT/day purchased RHA

Phase 1B — Self-funded from Y1 accruals (Month 18)
₹1.50 Cr equipment adds 4.568 MT/day RHA capacity
Payback: <2 months

Phase 2 — Self-funded from Y2+ accruals
Full second line on 74 GJ/day thermal surplus

v15 Changelog — Three corrections from v14: (1) CaO consumption increased +14.2% to 13.364 MT/day Phase 1A (full causticisation stoichiometry). (2) Thermal surplus corrected to 83 GJ/day with MVR (was 117 GJ/day — prior figure was pre-MVR gross). (3) OPEX Phase 1A ₹19.82 Cr/yr (was ₹19.49 Cr/yr). All other numbers unchanged.
Section 02
Process Chemistry

Four reactions drive the entire plant. Understanding these is the key to understanding every cost, yield, and design decision.

INPUT Rice Husk 20 MT/day COMBUSTION Furnace ≤700°C strict ↓ Bonus RHA 3.6 MT ↑ CO₂ 25 MT/day ↑ Steam 199 GJ PURCHASED RHA 11.432 MT/day ₹750/MT · 92% SiO₂ REACTION 1 NaOH Leach SiO₂ + 2NaOH → Na₂SiO₃ + H₂O 90°C · 2hr · PP-lined RHA in: 15.032 MT NaOH makeup 4.375 MT/day REACTION 2 PS Precipitation Na₂SiO₃ + CO₂ → SiO₂↓ + Na₂CO₃ CO₂ FREE — from furnace pH 5.5–9 · 50–70°C → SiO₂↓ = PS product REACTION 3 + 4 Causticisation Na₂CO₃ + Ca(OH)₂ → 2NaOH + CaCO₃↓ NaOH recycled 82% → CaCO₃ = Nano-PCC CaO in: 13.364 MT/day PRODUCT 1 Ppt. Silica 13.149 MT/day PRODUCT 2 Nano-PCC 20.272 MT/day NaOH recycle Residue 2.86 MT/day Phase 1A Process Flow · Fluxara DPR v15

Figure 1 — Simplified process flow diagram showing 4 core reactions and product streams

Why ≤700°C is an inviolable rule

Below 700°C, the silica in rice husk remains in an amorphous (non-crystalline) state — structurally disordered at the atomic level. This is essential: amorphous SiO₂ dissolves readily in NaOH, giving 88% extraction efficiency.

Above 700°C, silica undergoes crystallisation into cristobalite — a highly ordered crystal lattice. Cristobalite does NOT dissolve in NaOH at any practical concentration or temperature. The RHA becomes chemically inert and the entire batch is wasted. This is why a CEMS (Continuous Emissions Monitoring System) is wired to an auto-shutoff at 720°C — a 20°C safety buffer.

The Four Reactions

Reaction 1 — NaOH Leaching (Extraction)
SiO₂ + 2NaOH → Na₂SiO₃ + H₂O
Conditions: 10% NaOH solution · 90°C · 2 hours · PP-lined SS reactors
Ratio: 1.331 kg NaOH per kg SiO₂ (from MW: 2×40.00 / 60.08)
Extraction efficiency: 88% (lab validation required before engineering freeze)
Output: Na₂SiO₃ (sodium silicate solution, also called "water glass")
What is Sodium Silicate (Water Glass)?

Na₂SiO₃ is a clear, viscous liquid used industrially in adhesives, cements, and detergents. At Fluxara it is an intermediate — it is never sold. Instead it is fed directly into Reaction 2 to precipitate silica. The "water glass" is essentially a dissolved form of silica with sodium attached — Reaction 2 removes the sodium by replacing it with CO₂.

Reaction 2 — PS Precipitation (Carbon Saturation)
Na₂SiO₃ + CO₂ + H₂O → SiO₂↓ + Na₂CO₃
CO₂ source: 100% internally from furnace flue gas — ZERO purchase cost
CO₂ fed at 5% excess over stoichiometric (9.36 MT/day = stoich 8.92 × 1.05) for pH endpoint control
pH target: 5.5–8.5 (dental/food grade) or 6–9 (HDS rubber grade) · Temperature: 50–70°C
SiO₂ precipitates as fine white particles → filtered, washed, spray-dried = Precipitated Silica
How particle size (and thus grade) is controlled

The pH at which CO₂ is added controls when silica nucleates vs. grows. At higher pH (8–9), fewer nucleation sites form → larger particles → Standard grade (D50 ~20 µm). At lower pH (5.5–7), rapid nucleation creates many small particles → HDS grade (CTAB ≥175 mg/g, CIPD ≥80%). Dental grade requires additional washing to reduce lead below 1 ppm (Pb ≤1 ppm per FSSAI E551).

The CTAB surfactant added post-precipitation coats each silica particle. CTAB consumption — 0.289 MT/day (₹1,80,000/MT, imported) — is the primary driver of HDS premium. This is why CTAB supply chain (4-week buffer mandatory) is the highest supply-risk item in the BOM.

Reaction 3 — NaOH Recovery via Causticisation (also makes Nano-PCC)
Na₂CO₃ + Ca(OH)₂ → 2NaOH + CaCO₃↓
Per kg Na₂CO₃: Ca(OH)₂ required = 0.699 kg · NaOH recovered = 0.755 kg · CaCO₃ (nano-PCC) = 0.944 kg
NaOH recovery rate: 82% (MUST validate via lab trial — highest cost-risk parameter)
CaCO₃ precipitates as ultra-fine particles → classified → coated (stearic acid for sealant grade) = Nano-PCC
PCC is OBLIGATORY — cannot defer it without collapsing NaOH recovery economics
Most critical pre-commissioning activity: Causticisation lab trial. NaOH is 27.7% of total OPEX (₹5.49 Cr/yr). Every 1% improvement in recovery rate saves ₹0.47 Cr/yr. The 82% figure is an engineering estimate — lab validation before engineering freeze is mandatory.
Reaction 4 — CaO Slaking (On-site, Mandatory)
CaO + H₂O → Ca(OH)₂ (ΔH = −63.7 kJ/mol, exothermic)
CaO purity: ≥85% (Piduguralla, AP, ~150 km) — XRF verify each delivery
Yield: 1.122 kg Ca(OH)₂ per kg CaO at 85% purity (from MW: 0.85 × 74.09 / 56.08)
POLICY: Always buy CaO and slake on-site — do NOT buy pre-slaked Ca(OH)₂ (more expensive, shorter shelf life)

Molecular Weight Reference (IUPAC 2021)

CompoundFormulaMW (g/mol)Role in Process
Silicon DioxideSiO₂60.08Feedstock from RHA
Sodium HydroxideNaOH40.00Leaching reagent, recovered
Sodium SilicateNa₂SiO₃122.06Intermediate (water glass)
Carbon DioxideCO₂44.01Precipitation reagent (free, from furnace)
Sodium CarbonateNa₂CO₃105.99NaOH recovery feedstock
Calcium HydroxideCa(OH)₂74.09Causticisation reagent (from CaO slaking)
Calcium CarbonateCaCO₃100.09Nano-PCC product
Calcium Oxide (quicklime)CaO56.08Purchased feedstock ₹6,000/MT
WaterH₂O18.02Solvent throughout
Section 03
Mass Balance

What goes in, what comes out, and how the numbers are derived. All figures for Phase 1A unless noted.

Reading a Mass Balance

A mass balance is simply a material accounting statement: inputs = outputs + accumulation. For a continuous steady-state plant (no accumulation), every kilogram of raw material must appear somewhere in the outputs — either as product, by-product, waste, or atmospheric emission.

The key chain: RHA → SiO₂ extraction → Na₂SiO₃ → PS precipitation → Na₂CO₃ → NaOH recovery + Nano-PCC. The 12% of SiO₂ that is NOT extracted (100% − 88% = 12%) leaves as desilicated residue sold to brick kilns at ₹900/MT.

StreamPhase 1A (MT/day)Phase 1B (MT/day)Notes
INPUTS
Rice husk combusted20.00020.000Thermal anchor — unchanged in Ph1B
Purchased RHA (92% SiO₂)11.43216.000₹750/MT contract (min 90% SiO₂ clause)
Bonus RHA from combustion3.6003.600₹0 cost — from own furnace
NaOH fresh makeup (100%)4.3755.705As 48% lye: 9.114 / 11.882 MT/day
CaO quicklime v1513.36417.440≥85% purity · v15 +14.2% from v14
CTAB surfactant0.2890.376Imported · ₹1,80,000/MT · 4-wk buffer
Stearic acid0.1620.211PCC coating for sealant grade
INTERMEDIATE
Total RHA to leach reactor15.03219.600Purchased + bonus
SiO₂ available (92% of RHA)13.82918.032
SiO₂ extracted (88% eff.)12.17015.868Goes to precipitation
OUTPUTS — PRODUCTS
Precipitated Silica (PS)13.14917.1454,339 / 5,658 MT/yr @ 330 days
Nano-PCC20.27226.4326,690 / 8,723 MT/yr — obligatory co-product
OUTPUTS — BY-PRODUCTS
Desilicated residue2.8623.732₹900/MT to brick kilns — revenue
CO₂ generated (combustion)25.05025.050Unchanged in Ph1B (same husk quantity)
CO₂ consumed (precipitation)9.36012.204Includes 5% excess over stoichiometric
CO₂ surplus (BCR upside)15.69012.846NOT in base revenue — BCR upside only
WATER
Fresh water makeup84 KLD110 KLDAfter 80% ZLD recycle

Table 1 — Daily mass balance, Phase 1A and Phase 1B comparison

Why PS output (13.149 MT) exceeds SiO₂ extracted (12.170 MT): Precipitated silica is not pure SiO₂. The spray-dried product retains ~8% moisture and surface hydroxyl groups (Si-OH), plus small quantities of surface-treatment chemicals (CTAB). The product specification is for the amorphous SiO₂ content, not total mass.
Why Nano-PCC output (20.272 MT) is larger than PS output (13.149 MT)

This surprises many people. The answer is stoichiometry: per mole of Na₂CO₃ converted, the CaCO₃ product has MW = 100.09 g/mol, but the NaOH "input equivalent" (2×NaOH = 80 g/mol) is lighter. Furthermore, Ca(OH)₂ (from CaO slaking) adds calcium mass to the product. So the PCC stream carries the weight of both the carbonate anion AND the calcium cation — it is inherently a heavier molecule per mole of sodium processed.

Combined with CaO purchased at 13.364 MT/day, the product PCC tonnage necessarily exceeds the silica tonnage. This is structural, not an error.

Section 04
Energy Balance & MVR

How 20 MT/day of rice husk becomes 199 GJ/day of useful heat, why MVR is mandatory, and where the 83 GJ/day surplus goes.

Reading an Energy Balance

Net Calorific Value (NCV) is the energy released per kg of fuel burned, accounting for the energy lost evaporating moisture in the fuel. Rice husk has NCV ≈ 12,150 kJ/kg at 10% moisture. At 20 MT/day = 20,000 kg/day: gross thermal = 20,000 × 12,150 = 243,000,000 kJ/day = 243 GJ/day.

A boiler cannot capture 100% — efficiency is typically 80–85%. At 82%: useful heat = 243 × 0.82 = 199.3 GJ/day. This is the energy available for process use.

MVR (Mechanical Vapour Recompression) is a heat pump for evaporators. Instead of using fresh steam to evaporate water from the sodium silicate solution, MVR compresses the vapour produced and reuses it as the heat source. At 65% energy saving on evaporation: MVR saves 0.65 × 167.1 = 108.6 GJ/day. Without this saving, process heat demand (224.9 GJ/day) would exceed supply (199.3 GJ/day) by 25.6 GJ/day — the plant cannot operate at design throughput.

Energy Waterfall — Phase 1A Daily GJ 243 GJ Gross Thermal 20 MT RH × NCV −43.7 GJ Boiler Loss 18% inefficiency 199.3 GJ Useful Heat @82% boiler eff. 224.9 GJ Need w/o MVR DEFICIT: −25.6 GJ +108.6 GJ MVR Saving 65% of evap 116.3 GJ Process w/ MVR Evap+Leach+Dry 83 GJ SURPLUS Phase 1B + 2 anchor

Figure 2 — Energy waterfall: from gross thermal to 83 GJ/day surplus

Energy ItemGJ/dayNotes
Rice husk NCV (as-received, 10% moisture)12,150 kJ/kgPer kg husk
Gross thermal (20 TPD)243.020,000 kg × 12,150 kJ/kg ÷ 1,000
Boiler efficiency loss (18%)−43.71 − 0.82 = 18% loss
Useful heat available199.3243.0 × 0.82
WITHOUT MVR (shown for reference only — plant CANNOT operate in this mode)
Evaporation demand (no MVR)167.1Concentrating Na₂SiO₃ solution
Leach reactor heat42.7Heating to 90°C
Spray dryer heat15.1Drying PS to <6% moisture
Total process demand (no MVR)224.9EXCEEDS supply by 25.6 GJ — DEFICIT
WITH MVR (design basis — v15)
MVR saving (65% of 167.1)−108.6Evaporation reduced to 58.5 GJ/day
Evaporation with MVR58.5
Leach reactor42.7Unchanged
Spray dryer15.1Unchanged
Process heat with MVR116.3v15 corrected figure
Thermal surplus (with MVR) v1583.0199.3 − 116.3 GJ/day
Phase 1B consumes~9.0Extra 4.568 MT/day RHA processing
Remaining for Phase 2~74.083 − 9 GJ/day
MVR (₹1.50 Cr) must be installed at Day 1 commissioning. Without MVR: 25.6 GJ/day deficit. Plant cannot reach design throughput. No MVR = plant runs at ~73% of design capacity maximum on thermal constraints alone, collapsing revenue by ~₹15 Cr/yr. MVR is non-negotiable infrastructure, not an optional efficiency upgrade.
Electrical Load

Installed: 585 kW

Operating: 454 kW

Solar PV: 250 kWp (315,000 kWh/yr)

Net grid: ~2.13M kWh/yr

Cost: ₹1.49 Cr/yr @₹7/kWh

Solar PV Offset

250 kWp rooftop system

Generation: 315,000 kWh/yr

Saving: ~₹0.22 Cr/yr

Self-consumption priority — no export in base model

Water Balance

ZLD recovery: 80%

Fresh makeup Ph1A: 84 KLD

Fresh makeup Ph1B: 110 KLD

ETP+ZLD: 25 KLD capacity

Section 05
CAPEX — ₹30.96 Cr Total Project Cost

Capital expenditure breakdown, financing structure, and key equipment rationale.

CAPEX Category₹ Lakhs₹ Cr
Land — 3 acres TSIIC Sangareddy @₹1 Cr/acre3003.00
Civil (sheds, RCC, roads, drains, bunds)1781.78
Process equipment subtotal1,34513.45
Ancillary — E&I + piping @52% of process equip6996.99
Utilities (HT, DG 200 kVA, Solar 250 kWp)1701.70
Contingency @8%2152.15
Pre-operative + WC + DPIIT grant (−₹35L)1901.90
TOTAL PROJECT COST3,09630.96

Financing Structure

Component₹ Cr%Terms
Term Loan (Debt)20.1265%10.5% p.a. · 7yr · 12M moratorium
Promoter Equity10.8435%Surya Industries + promoter
Annual Debt Service4.07 Cr/yrPost-moratorium (Y2+)

Key Process Equipment

Equipment₹ LakhsNotes
Furnace 20 TPD + IBR boiler280IBR registration mandatory
Leach reactors ×3 (SS/PP-lined, 10KL)12090°C NaOH — PP lining critical
Filter presses ×2110
Spray dryers ×2 (500 kg/hr, SS316)160Food grade requires SS316
Causticisation + CaO slaker90
Triple-effect evaporator (MVR-ready)150MVR mandatory from Day 1
PCC hydrocyclone classifiers80Particle size control
ETP + ZLD (25 KLD)120ZLD Day 1 — regulatory
QC Lab (BET + PSD + XRF)40XRF for CaO purity, BET for PS spec
Furnace/boiler building = fire-rated RCC (NOT PEB). IBR (Indian Boiler Regulations) registration is a statutory requirement before steam can be raised. Allow 8–10 weeks for IBR inspection and certification.
Section 06
OPEX — ₹19.82 Cr/yr at 100% Utilisation

Operating cost breakdown for Phase 1A. Understanding cost structure is essential for managing DSCR in ramp-up years.

Variable Costs

Item₹ Cr/yr% OPEX
NaOH 48% lye (9.114 MT/d × ₹18,240 × 330)5.4927.7%
Rice husk (20 MT/d × ₹5,500 × 330)3.6318.3%
CaO quicklime v15 (13.364 × ₹6,000 × 330)2.6513.4%
CTAB surfactant (0.289 × ₹1,80,000 × 330)1.728.7%
Stearic acid0.643.2%
Purchased RHA0.281.4%
Packing + transport1.206.1%
Electricity (variable)0.492.5%
Variable Subtotal16.1081.2%

Fixed Costs

Item₹ Cr/yr
Electricity (base grid, net solar)1.00
Labour (25 staff, avg ₹4.8L CTC)1.20
Maintenance (2% of fixed assets)0.65
Admin + insurance + other0.87
Fixed Subtotal3.72
TOTAL OPEX Phase 1A₹19.82 Cr/yr

OPEX Ramp (Phase 1A)

Y1 — 60% utilisation₹13.38 Cr
Y2 — 75% utilisation₹15.79 Cr
Y3 — 90% utilisation₹18.20 Cr
Y4+ — 100% utilisation₹19.82 Cr

Cost Sensitivity

ScenarioOPEX Impact
NaOH recovery +1% (82%→83%)−₹0.47 Cr/yr
Rice husk price +₹500/MT+₹0.33 Cr/yr
NaOH price +10%+₹0.55 Cr/yr
CaO price +₹500/MT+₹0.22 Cr/yr
CTAB price +10%+₹0.17 Cr/yr
NaOH dominates at 27.7% of OPEX. Lab validation of the 82% causticisation recovery rate is the single highest-priority pre-commissioning activity. Improving from 82% to 88% saves ₹2.82 Cr/yr.

Phase 1B total OPEX: ₹22.40 Cr/yr (v15 corrected). Phase 1B OPEX includes the extra 4.568 MT/day RHA and proportional chemical costs.

Section 07
Financial Model & DSCR

Year-by-year P&L, debt service coverage, and how the model reaches bankability.

Understanding DSCR (Debt Service Coverage Ratio)

DSCR = (EBITDA − Income Tax on PBT) ÷ (Principal Repayment + Interest). It answers: "For every ₹1 of debt service due this year, how many rupees of operating cash does the plant generate?" Banks require DSCR ≥ 1.25× as the loan covenant. A DSCR of 2× means the plant generates twice the cash needed to service debt — very comfortable. A DSCR of 0.27× (Year 1) means the plant cannot service debt from operations — the promoter's bridging WC of ₹1.55 Cr covers the gap. Year 1 is the moratorium period; no principal repayment is due, only interest.

Y1/Y2 DSCR uses EBITDA/DS directly (minimal tax because EBITDA is low or moratorium applies). Y3/Y4+ include 25.17% income tax on PBT after depreciation. The exact tax figure requires the depreciation schedule annexure (pending for v16).

YearUtilisationRevenueOPEX EBITDAEBITDA%Debt ServiceDSCR
Y1
Moratorium
60% ₹13.94 Cr₹13.38 Cr ₹0.56 Cr4.0% ₹2.11 Cr 0.27× ⚠
Y2
HDS qualified
75% ₹30.81 Cr₹16.73 Cr ₹14.08 Cr45.7% ₹4.07 Cr 3.46×
Y3
FSSAI + Ph1B
90% ₹51.12 Cr₹20.32 Cr ₹30.80 Cr60.3% ₹3.73 Cr 7.57×
Y4+
Full premium
100% ₹61.75 Cr₹22.40 Cr ₹39.35 Cr63.7% ₹3.38 Cr 9.64×
Y1 DSCR = 0.27× — this is expected and manageable. Y1 is the moratorium period (no principal due, only interest ~₹2.11 Cr). At 60% utilisation the EBITDA is only ₹0.56 Cr. Promoter must have ₹1.55 Cr bridging WC available to cover the interest gap. Y2 is the first comfortable debt service year at 3.46×.
Break-even
~46%

Utilisation at which EBITDA covers fixed OPEX + interest

Project IRR
~37–41%

Based on 10-year DCF on full project cash flows

Equity IRR
~66–70%

Leverage amplifies equity returns significantly

ROE (Y4+)
~350%

Return on equity base of ₹10.84 Cr at Y4+ EBITDA

Revenue Assumptions by Year

How Revenue Jumps from Y1 (₹14 Cr) to Y2 (₹31 Cr)

The jump is not just utilisation (60%→75% adds only ~25% volume). The key driver is product qualification: HDS (High Dispersibility Silica) for green tyres qualifies in Y2. HDS commands ₹45–50/kg domestic vs. ₹26/kg standard — a 73–92% premium. Once the first tyre manufacturer qualifies the batch (typically 3–6 month trial + approval cycle), the entire HDS volume shifts to premium pricing. Revenue per MT effectively doubles for the HDS portion. Similarly, Y3's FSSAI dental certification unlocks ₹90–95/kg pricing (3.5× standard).

Section 08
Product Grades & Pricing

Precipitated silica and nano-PCC grade specifications, pricing, and target markets.

Precipitated Silica Grades

Grade₹/kg Domestic₹/kg Export FOBKey SpecApplicationsTimeline
Standard₹26₹42BET 140–165 m²/g · D50 ≤20 µmRubber, animal feed, carrierDay 1
HDS₹45–50₹72–84CTAB ≥175 mg/g · CIPD ≥80%Green tyres (Michelin, Birla)Year 2
Dental/Food (FSSAI E551)₹90–95₹144–152Pb ≤1 ppm · D50 ≤12 µmToothpaste, food anti-cakingYear 3+
What is CTAB value and why does it determine HDS grade?

CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) surface area is the standard test for measuring the silica surface accessible to polymer chains in a rubber compound. The CTAB surface area (mg/g) directly correlates with how well the silica disperses in the tyre rubber matrix — hence "High Dispersibility Silica."

A CTAB ≥175 mg/g with CIPD (CTAB-based In-rubber Performance Descriptor) ≥80% means the silica is engineered for low rolling resistance (better fuel economy) — the defining performance claim of green tyres. This specification requires precise pH control during precipitation, strict particle size control, and CTAB surface treatment post-filter.

CIPD is calculated from dynamic mechanical analysis of the rubber compound — tyre manufacturers run this test in-house as part of supplier qualification. This is why HDS qualification takes 3–6 months and requires supplying samples before any order.

Nano-PCC Grades

Grade₹/kgParticle SizeApplications
Coatings / Bulk₹8–152 µm d50Paints, coatings, paper
Sealant (stearic coated)₹260.7 µm d50Silicone sealants (GE, Momentive)
Plastics (OCC coated)₹420.5 µm d50PP/PE compounding, masterbatch
Why surface coating determines PCC grade and price

Raw (uncoated) CaCO₃ is hydrophilic — it attracts water and clumps in polymer matrices, causing weak spots. Stearic acid coating makes each particle surface hydrophobic (oil-loving), allowing it to disperse uniformly in silicone or polymer matrices without agglomeration. The coating adds minimal cost (₹1,20,000/MT stearic acid at 0.162 MT/day) but commands a 50–100% price premium over uncoated bulk PCC.

Particle size (d50 = median diameter) is controlled via hydrocyclone classifiers. The plastics grade at 0.5 µm requires tighter classification and more passes — hence highest price at ₹42/kg.

Export route: Chennai / Krishnapatnam port (~300–380 km from Sangareddy). FCL (Full Container Load) containers. At Phase 1B steady state: 5–6 containers/month. Export pricing: PS 61–109% premium over domestic. Standard ₹42/kg · HDS ₹72–84/kg · Dental ₹144–152/kg FOB.
Section 09
Phase 1B Upgrade — ₹1.50 Cr, Month 18

Self-funded expansion from Year 1 accruals. Equipment-constrained (not thermally). Payback under 2 months.

The Phase 1B logic

Phase 1A leaves 83 GJ/day thermal surplus. Phase 1B only requires ~9 GJ/day to process an additional 4.568 MT/day of purchased RHA. The binding constraint is equipment throughput, not heat. A second filter press, a second spray dryer, an extra leach reactor, plus piping — totalling ₹1.50 Cr — unlocks this capacity.

At ₹9.29 Cr/yr incremental EBITDA from ₹1.50 Cr investment, the payback is under 2 months. This is why Phase 1B is funded from Year 1 accruals, never from bank debt. Installing it at Month 18 (mid-Year 2) allows the first year of cash to accumulate before the investment.

Phase 1B Equipment₹ Lakhs
Additional filter press30
Second spray dryer65
Extra leach reactor25
Piping + E&I30
Phase 1B TPC₹1.50 Cr
MetricPhase 1APhase 1B
Total RHA/day15.032 MT19.600 MT
PS/year4,339 MT5,658 MT
PCC/year6,690 MT8,723 MT
Revenue (Y4+)+₹12.33 Cr/yr
EBITDA increment+₹9.29 Cr/yr
Payback<2 months
Thermal used~9 GJ/day
Thermal remaining83 GJ/day~74 GJ/day
Phase 2 anchor: After Phase 1B, 74 GJ/day thermal surplus remains — enough for a full second production line (Phase 2), self-funded from Year 2+ accruals. Zero bank debt for any expansion beyond Phase 1A.
Section 10
Sensitivity Analysis

Stress tests on the Y4+ base case (₹61.75 Cr revenue, ₹39.35 Cr EBITDA, 9.64× DSCR). All scenarios remain above the 1.25× covenant.

ScenarioEBITDA ImpactRevised EBITDADSCRVerdict
PS price −20% all grades−₹7.77 Cr₹32.02 Cr7.87×Bankable
NaOH price +30%−₹2.75 Cr₹37.04 Cr9.10×Bankable
NaOH price +50%−₹4.58 Cr₹35.21 Cr8.65×Bankable
Rice husk price doubles−₹3.63 Cr₹36.16 Cr8.88×Bankable
Utilisation 85% in Y4+−₹4.57 Cr₹35.22 Cr8.65×Bankable
Dental/FSSAI delayed to Y5−₹8.90 Cr (Y3)₹22.33 Cr (Y3)5.49× (Y3)Bankable
Combined: PS−15% + NaOH+30% + 85% util−₹14.00 Cr₹25.79 Cr6.34×Bankable
Worst case: PS−25% + NaOH+50% + 75% + no export−₹26.52 Cr₹13.27 Cr3.26×Stressed (>1.25×)
Upside: BCR + electricity export+₹1.27 Cr₹41.06 Cr10.09×Upside
BCR Carbon Credits (Upside Only — not in base model): 15.69 MT/day CO₂ surplus × 330 days = 5,178 MT/yr CO₂ avoided. At ₹400/tCO₂ via Puro.earth → ~₹1.27 Cr/yr additional revenue. This is excluded from the base P&L as BCR market prices are not yet contracted.
Section 11
Implementation Timeline

36-month critical path from financial close to FSSAI-certified dental/food grade production.

Month 0
Financial Close · Land Possession · PMC Appointed
Debt drawdown begins. TSIIC land registration. Project Management Consultant contracted.
Month 1
Customer Engagement Begins
NOT after commissioning — HDS tyre manufacturers and PCC coatings buyers contacted now. HDS qualification cycle is 3–6 months; starting early is critical for Y2 revenue.
Months 1–2
Engineering Freeze · Equipment BOM
Process design frozen. Bill of Materials finalised. Vendor shortlisting for major equipment.
Months 2–4
Lab Validation — Critical Gate
SiO₂ extraction efficiency (target 88%), causticisation NaOH recovery (target 82%), sodium balance closure. Results gate engineering freeze. Most important pre-CAPEX activity.
Months 3–8
Civil Construction · Equipment Procurement · E&I · CEMS
Parallel activities: RCC building (fire-rated), equipment POs, electrical & instrumentation, CEMS installation and pre-commissioning. IBR registration process starts.
Months 8–10
Equipment Installation · Mechanical Completion
All equipment commissioned. Pressure testing, leak checks. TSPCB inspection for CTO (Consent to Operate).
Month 10
FSSAI Central Licence Application Filed
12–18 month approval cycle. Must file at Month 10 to receive FSSAI certification by Month 36 (Y3). Filing cannot be deferred.
Month 11
Trial Samples to Target Customers
First production batches sent to HDS and PCC customers for qualification testing.
Month 12
Commercial Production Begins — Year 1 Start
60% utilisation ramp begins. Moratorium period ends. Revenue recognition starts.
Month 18
Phase 1B Equipment Installed · Export Stream Activated
₹1.50 Cr from Y1 accruals. Second spray dryer + filter press + leach reactor. Capacity increases to 5,658 MT PS/yr + 8,723 MT PCC/yr.
Month 24 (Y2)
HDS Qualification Complete · 75% Utilisation
First comfortable DSCR year at 3.46×. HDS revenue at ₹45–50/kg drives major revenue jump.
Month 36 (Y3)
FSSAI Certified · Dental/Food Revenue Activated
Full premium portfolio activated. 90% utilisation. DSCR 7.57×. Phase 2 planning from accruals begins.
Section 12
Regulatory & Compliance

Key statutory requirements and certifications for operating and selling in target markets.

Environmental

RequirementDetails
TSPCB CategoryOrange (PI 41–59), NIC 2029 "Agro-waste beneficiation"
TSPCB Consent (NOC)6–9 months processing time — apply at land possession
CEMSMandatory on chimney before CTO is granted
ZLDDay 1 — zero liquid discharge mandatory
PCB NOCGreen category — applies to lab chemicals

Product Standards

StandardApplies To
FSSAI E551Food-grade precipitated silica (Y3+)
IS 6579Precipitated silica — general industrial
BISToothpaste-grade silica
IBR RegistrationBoiler — mandatory before steam operations

Raw Material Sourcing Constraints

Rice husk must be sourced from FCI / rice mills within 50 km radius (logistics economics). Seasonal price variation ±15% (₹4,500–6,500/MT). CaO from Piduguralla, AP (~150 km) — XRF purity verification each delivery mandatory (≥85% CaO). CTAB imported — 4-week buffer stock mandatory, highest supply disruption risk in BOM.
Section 13
v15 Audit Trail & Locked Constants

All changes from v14 to v15, and the inviolable design decisions that cannot be altered without a full DPR revision.

v15 Corrections from v14

Parameterv14 Valuev15 ValueChangeReason
CaO consumption (Ph1A)11.698 MT/day13.364 MT/day+14.2%Full causticisation stoichiometry — prior figure understated Ca(OH)₂ needed to convert all Na₂CO₃
CaO consumption (Ph1B)15.253 MT/day17.440 MT/day+14.3%Same correction applied to Phase 1B
Thermal surplus (with MVR)117 GJ/day83 GJ/day−29%Prior figure was unsupported; Section 6 audit: 199.3 − 116.3 = 83 GJ/day
OPEX Phase 1A₹19.49 Cr/yr₹19.82 Cr/yr+₹0.33 CrCaO cost correction (+₹0.33 Cr/yr at Ph1A)
OPEX Phase 1B₹21.97 Cr/yr₹22.40 Cr/yr+₹0.43 CrCaO cost correction at Ph1B volume
Ph1B incr. EBITDA₹9.72 Cr/yr₹9.29 Cr/yr−₹0.43 CrHigher CaO OPEX reduces EBITDA increment

Inviolable Design Decisions

#RuleConsequence of Violation
1Hybrid config (purchased + bonus RHA) is optimalFully-purchased RHA eliminates ~₹10 Cr/yr bonus streams
2Bonus ash processed into PS/PCC — never sold rawDestroys economics; raw ash is ₹0–300/MT vs ₹26+/kg product
3Phase 1B from Y1 accruals only — never bank debtIncreases leverage and debt service beyond covenant margins
4Phase 2 self-funded from Y2+ accrualsZero bank debt for any Phase 2 expansion
5MVR mandatory from Day 1Without MVR: 25.6 GJ/day deficit — plant cannot operate
6Buy CaO, slake on-site — never pre-slaked Ca(OH)₂Higher cost, shorter shelf life, logistics waste
7Customer engagement Month 1Delays HDS qualification → misses Y2 premium pricing
8FSSAI application at Month 10 commissioning12–18M cycle delays dental revenue beyond Y3
9PCC is obligatory — causticisation is not optionalWithout PCC, NaOH recovery collapses → OPEX doubles
10Furnace temp ≤700°C strictly (CEMS auto-shutoff at 720°C)Above 700°C: cristobalite forms → RHA chemically inert → batch lost
11Furnace/boiler building = fire-rated RCC (not PEB)PEB is not permitted for IBR-registered boiler structures
12Land = ₹1 Cr/acre (not ₹17L/acre — old error)₹17L/acre was a prior version error — TPC would be understated by ₹2.5 Cr